A group of Burlesque girls got their placards out and went on protest in Edinburgh recently after receiving a less than complimentary review in The Scotsman.
Yet, the girls weren’t protesting because their show received a bad review, they were protesting because the review implied:
that if you were a burlesque performer you could not be a feminist
Sally Scott had tactfully suggested that the women’s expressions were like that of a “blown-up sex doll”. That’s one way to ruffle the feathers of a bunch of burlesque ladies.
The performers, obviously not best pleased at being compared to sex commodities, said of the review:
It said we were somehow anti-feminist and conforming to sexism. We believe we are feminists. We are promoting this idea that a women can have brains and beauty and be proud of both.
This story jumped out at me because while I’m eating my cheese sandwich and reading the article on BBC News, there is a copy of Natasha Walter’s Living Dolls: The Return to Sexism sitting in front of me at my desk. (weird!).
Don’t get me wrong… I’m only on page 9 BUT this exact issue is dealt with by Walter at the beginning of her book. She identifies us as living in a “hypersexual culture” that is “often celebrated as a positive sign of women’s liberation and empowerment.” To further her point she uses pole-dancing as an example:
the fashion for pole-dancing classes is talked about as if it were liberating for women […] Even occupations such as lap dancing and prostitution are now surrounded by this quasi-feminist rhetoric.
Burlesque has become increasingly popular in the past few years, but with its popularity it has become increasingly sexualised with many people now failing to see the distinction between burlesque shows and strip joints. On th other side of the coin, women actually enjoy going to see burlesque shows because it showcases real women with real bodies. Alex Proud formerly ran a burlesque show and says:
The performers don’t have bodies out of fashion magazines […] Women enjoy it because they see it as empowerment. It’s about them regaining their own sexuality and enjoying it.
Yet while I think Sally Scott has demeaned these women in her damning article more than the burlesque has, in the wider context of things, her article does back up Natasha Walters’ argument that there is a tension between our overtly sexualised culture and feminism.
A Women’s right organisation at change.org shot back at Scott saying:
Apparently Scott isn’t familiar with the plethora of politically savvy women who utilize burlesque as a platform for social commentary
Just because “savvy” and intellectual women freely CHOSE to partake in these professions, doesn’t make them a feminists. In fact, CHOICE is rarely ever free from any influence – are the women in these occupations being unconciously influenced by this “hypersexual culture” that Walter speaks off?
While I think sexual freedom and liberation is something to be celebrated, there is a danger that we might wake up one morning to find that our mates / sisters /daughters are aspiring to be glamour models / pornstars / pole-dancers / prostitutes… or is it already too late?
Back to burlesque. I’ve never been to a burlesque show myself so I can’t comment on it personally, although I do very much doubt it would leave me feeling depressed, supressed and ashamed…
(Despite what you might think of burlesque as an art form, you can’t knock those burlesque girls, there’s something noble about standing up for something you believe it, whatever it might be…)